All about windows phone apps, part 3

Windows phone apps, it's not yet ready to be easily inferred from the ( still ) lack of software and its not solid elements of the ecosystem , but also from incomplete standard feature of Windows Phone apps itself. I would not want to get carried away on the interpretation that when I know what is called Amber Update Amber update is a big update which will be applied to some of the Lumia series , especially those already using a version of Windows Phone 8 . At the time I wrote it already can do updates to Amber is the Lumia 920 , some even he was used out of the box such as the 1020 and the Lumia 925 . While the leaked version is not officially exist in the form of firmware that can be applied to a particular updater software on other series . But the important thing is the description of the update , as reported by Amber GsmArena.com , stated :

Windows phone apps, " However , Nokia has added some exclusive features , such as the Glance Screen , Smart Camera , FM Radio , Flip for silencing the phone by flipping it as well as the Data Sense app . The Location & Commerce branding HERE app suite has also been updated and includes the Maps v3.4 Here , Here and Here Drive + v2.2 v.3.5 Transit apps . "

Windows phone apps, For me it's all the extra features are software based . Which clearly hardware -based FM radio of course , and therein lies another clue about the maturity of the Windows Phone . My point is , software updates usually revolve around the improvement of existing ones , such as fixing bugs ( programming imperfections ) , close the security gap , or increase the efficiency of the application .

Windows phone apps, But why Amber This update should bring hardware -based applications ? FM radio obviously could not exist without the previously existing hardware components implanted in her . The point is , why when Windows Phone ( as OS ) out it does not facilitate all the potential in the existing hardware ? From here easily deduced , and actually provides confirmation again , that software is a crucial issue in Windows Phone . If we are to be easily ( and most likely it is true ) that Nokia is responsible for the hardware , while Microsoft is responsible for the software , Microsoft whether we can appoint more responsible in this case ?

To be continued

Share this post